Out of all the information already laid out, the most odd and
questionable events actually happen during the gospel resurrection
accounts.
In Part 1 you will read the the Bible
explicitly states that after you die you become spirit, that there is
only one death then Judgement. So if Jesus died he would therefor be
spirit and would have ascended to God immediately upon his death.
When the women arrive in three of the four accounts the stone has been rolled away. In Matthew 28:2-15
the stone is still closed when the women arrive, an angel causes an
earthquake and the stone rolls away. The angel says that Jesus is not
there and to meet him in Galilee. This is the only gospel that
insinuates that Jesus was actually spirit. The other three gospels
specifically have the stone moved away and also the cloth that Jesus was
wrapped in was still in the tomb.
I think it's important to
note that Marks gospel ends with a man telling the women to tell the
disciples to meet Jesus in Galilee. "Trembling and bewildered, the women went out and fled from the tomb. They said nothing to anyone, because they were afraid." Mark 16:8 Verses
9-20 are widely agreed upon that do not make up Mark's original ending
as they are not found in any of the earlier manuscripts(See my
manuscripts post). The women fled... and told NO ONE! I find this to be
quite interesting. Scholars believe that Mark did have an ending that
extended this one, but that it is lost. If there was scripture that had
an alternative ending where Jesus lives as an earthly man and ventures
out to seek the lost tribes of Israel like he was supposed to do as the
Jewish Messiah, it would make sense that it became "lost".
The other gospels have a resurrection account though. Back on Matthew's
there really isn't much interesting going on here except one thing...
there were witnesses to the angel creating the earthquake and the stone
being moved revealing an empty tomb. Matthew 28:11-15
Not only did they witness the event, they rushed to the priests and
told all that they seen. They were bribed by the priests to tell Pilate a
different story. These verses seem to show the priests caring about the
fate of the guards and make a story up so they won't be in trouble, the
problem is the story is a decent story and I am pretty sure the guards
would have forked their own money out in thanks to the priests.
In every gospel except Matthew we have the stone moved back, Jesus not
being in the tomb, and some cloth in the tomb. Showing that Jesus left
the cloth in spirit but for some reason couldn't exit the tomb in
spirit.
In Luke 24:5 the two men at the tomb spoke to the women and asked them “Why do you look for the living among the dead?" What
would make the men think the women were looking for the "living". Why
is this statement here if Jesus is presumed dead to them?
Moving on to Jesus' appearances. John 20:13-18
Mary Magdalene sees the empty tomb and starts crying, Jesus appears to
her and she doesn't recognize him. Okay so she isn't startled, Jesus
apparently isn't a spirit/ghost. Actually she thinks he is quite human
and has the appearance of the gardener. This is interesting because if
Jesus were to have survived, the nearest available clothes would have
been the gardener's clothes from the nearby gardeners shack. She asks
him where he had placed Jesus so that she can go get him. How was Mary
supposed to carry Jesus' 150+lbs body by herself? No body is mentioned
here, she specifically asks where Jesus was.
It wasn't until he speaks her name until she recognizes him as Jesus.
Did Mary startle, jump back, and freak out that Jesus was standing there
alive? No she does quite the opposite, she goes to embrace him, glad
that he is alive. Mary already knew from whatever she saw two nights
before, Jesus could be alive. Jesus stops her and says “Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father." Jesus
is literally saying he is not "dead" here, that he is an alive body of
flesh, and he hasn't gone to God yet. Why would Jesus not let Mary
embrace him? Was it because he was a spirit and she would have passed
right through him? No, nothing up to this point shows he is a spirit and
the events after this specifically prove he had a solid flesh body.
Then why? The most logical reason would be that Jesus was still alive,
still alive with the fresh wounds from his crucifixion. A hearty embrace
would have caused great pain to him and instead of worrying her about
it he tells her to go off to tell the disciples that she has seen him.
Continuing on with John, John 20:19-20
Jesus meets the disciples and shows them his wounds and they were
overjoyed. Jesus' wounds still exist after death? If Jesus has died and
is risen with his wounds does that mean anyone who has died a horrific
death(burning, decapitated, etc..) will they also be risen with these
wounds? Doesn't make sense. Later when he meets with Thomas he tells him
to touch his wounds. Why does he offer up the touch to Thomas but not
to Mary earlier in the same gospel? He is flesh.
In Luke 24:13-35
Jesus meets up with a couple disciples on a road. Again he is isn't
recognized until later when they actually sit down and face him to eat.
And yes i said "eat" Does a spirit need food? Why did Jesus need to eat?
Verse 23 they tell Jesus(not knowing they are speaking about jesus
himself) about his own recent events at the tomb they had heard from the
women... "but didn’t find his body. They came and told us that they had seen a vision of angels, who said he was alive."
Yes ALIVE. He
later meets up with the disciples and they are frightened. Why are they
frightened and think they have seen a ghost? Because as stated in Part 2
the disciples weren't near Jesus during his death, all the know is what
little they could see and what was told to them. All they knew was that
Jesus was dead. Jesus assures them he is no ghost. "Look at my hands and my feet. It is I myself! Touch me and see; a ghost does not have flesh and bones, as you see I have.” He proves he is not a ghost/spirit and again here offers them to touch him. Then like in John he eats with them. All signs point to alive.
The
ascension of Jesus portrayed in the gospels are contradictory. No
mention in Mark and Matthew. In Luke however we have Jesus ascending not
long after his meal with his disciples. John makes no mention of Jesus
ascending, but in the final verses of John John 21:25 it states "Jesus did many other things as well.
If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole
world would not have room for the books that would be written." So
apparently it took Jesus quite some time to ascend as he did so many
things afterward that it would fill the world with books. Well to me
that would seem that Jesus was walking around healing and performing
miracles for many many years to be able to fill up that many books.
Later in Acts, the final appearances of Jesus are stated....
Acts 1:3-4
" After his suffering, he presented himself to them and gave many convincing proofs that he was alive. He appeared to them over a period of forty days and spoke about the kingdom of God."
"After is suffering" Not after his death or resurrection.
"Convincing proofs that he was ALIVE" yes alive.
In chapter 4 again, he eats. Why would they mention this again and again? to prove he was ALIVE.
Recap:
* Jesus had secret disciples in the Sanhedrin, the same group of priests that plotted to kill him.
* The person that sentenced Jesus to death did not want to. In fact Pilate made many attempts to free him.
* Jesus at one point drank something that should have revived him and immediately "died"?
* The people who were close and knew Jesus watched the crucifixion from a distance.
* Upon Jesus' death something strange happened that caused everyone to flee except those that knew him.
* Jesus was on the cross no longer than 6 hours.
*
Pilate freely gave Joseph Jesus' body, even though he was part of the
Sanhedrin. (Pilate had to of known Joseph's loyalty to Jesus.)
* The substances that Joseph and Nicodemus used on Jesus are proven to have healing properties.
* The women came with the same substances 2 days later, a practice that should have happened that night.
* The stone was rolled away. Jesus didn't need to stone to be rolled away if he was spirit.
* Mary seen Jesus disguised as the gardener and asked him where he placed Jesus so she(alone) could take him?
*
Jesus wouldn't let Mary embrace him(an embrace would have been painful
compared to a touch), yet let other disciples touch him and feel his
wounds.
* Unlike Mary who had seen
Jesus in the tomb on the night of the crucifixion, the disciples were
startled to see Jesus.(They had heard, or from what they could see from
far away he had died)
* The disciples did not understand even after they seen the tomb empty why Jesus had to die?
*
Jesus assured the disciples he was alive and was of solid flesh by
letting them touch him, and by eating with them multiple times.
* Multiple verses in the bible state that Jesus was alive.
* The book of Acts states Jesus spent 40 days trying to convince people he was alive.
*
The ending of the gospel of John states Jesus did so many things after
the crucifixion, that there wouldn't be enough room in the world for the
books. This suggests that Jesus lived for a long time after the
crucifixion.
* Either way Jesus did not fulfill his final prophecy. Matthew 12:38-45
Jesus
states he will be in the belly of the earth for 3 days and 3 nights. If
you count the 1st day a full day and even the last day a full day(which
he was gone by sunrise), you still are short 1 night. Jesus was only in
the belly of the earth for 2 nights. Also Jonah went into the belly of
the whale "alive" was in the belly for 3 days and 3 nights "alive", and
came out of the belly "alive".
No comments:
Post a Comment